Some morphosyntactic and typological tendencies in East Polissian border dialects

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/APULTP.2025.50.41-52

Keywords:

Ukrainian language, East Polissian dialects, dialectology, language typology, East Slavic languages

Abstract

In Ukrainian and, more generally, East Slavic dialectology phonetics and lexis have been more systematically studied than other language levels such as morphology, syntax and phraseology. Notwithstanding the existence of primary and secondary sources such as dialectal Atlases, academic manuals and a long series of contributions on different dialectal aspects, studies devoted to dialectal morphosyntactic and typological characteristics are very limited, if not inexistent. This applies even more to border dialects.

Thus, this paper concisely outlines some morphosyntactic and typological tendencies typical of East Polissian border dialects, focusing on the area situated in the former district of Ripky (northwest of the town of Chernihiv) and extending towards Belarus. The core features of possessive constructions and the future of imperfective verbs are briefly described. Most of the reported syntactic characteristics (short sentences, ellipses, parataxis, etc.) are equally typical of spontaneous, colloquial speech and other non-standard varieties. The sample data are derived from recorded materials carried out in this specific dialect area between 2012 and 2018.

Subordination, although less complex than the respective standard languages, tends to follow the Ukrainian Belarusian pattern with some overlaps that, at a first level of analysis, could be ascribed to Russian influence on Ukrainian and Belarusian local varieties. Even though possession and futurity, especially in relation to standard languages, have already been dealt with in linguistic-typological studies, most contributions largely neglect diatopic and diastratic variation. In this sense, the analysis of recently acquired dialect data compared with already available language-typological evidence can undoubtedly improve existing classifications of (East) Slavic and, more widely, European languages.

References

Atlas of the Ukrainian Language [Atlas Ukrajins'koji Movy – AUM]. (1984–2001). 3 vols. Matvijas, I. H. et al. (Eds.). Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].

Atlas of East Polesie Dialects [Atlas shidnopolis'kyh hovirok – ASH] (2019)/ D.A.Mareyev, Kyiv: Instytut Ukrajinskoji Movy NAN [in Ukrainian].

Bevzenko, S. P. (1960). Historical morphology of the Ukrainian language [Istorychna morfolohija ukrajins'koji movy]. Uzhhorod: Zakarpatske oblasne vydavnyctvo [in Ukrainian].

Bevzenko, S.P. (1980). Ukrainian dialectology [Ukrajins'ka dialektolohija]. Kyiv: Vyshcha shkola [in Ukrainian].

Bevzenko, S. P., Hryshchenko, A.P., Lukinova T. B., Nimchuk V.V. et al. (1978). History of the Ukrainian language. Morphology [Istorija ukrajins'koji movy. Morfolohija]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].

Dialectological Atlas of the Belarusian Language [Dyjalektalahichnyi Atlas Belaruskaj Movy – DABM]. (1963) / R.I. Avanesaŭ, Ju.F.Mackevič et al. (Eds.). Minsk: Vydavectva Akadėmi Navuk BSSR [in Belarusian].

Dahl, Ö. (2000). The grammar of future time reference in European languages. Dahl, Ö. Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 309-327 [in English].

Danylenko, A. (2011). Is there any inflectional future in East Slavic? A case of Ukrainian against Romance reopened. Nomachi, M. Grammaticalizationin Slavic Languages: From Areal and Typological Perspectives. Sapporo: Slavic Research Center, Hokkaido University, 147-177 [in English].

Del Gaudio, S. (2015). Ukrainian among the Slavic languages [L'ucraino tra le lingue slave]. Ricerche Slavistiche, 13, 35-71 [іn Italiano].

Del Gaudio, S. (2017). An Introduction to Ukrainian Dialectology. Frankfurt am Main etc.: Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/b12421 [in English].

Del Gaudio, S. (2023a). The North Ukrainian Dialect of Vyšneve in the East Slavic Context: Towards a Final Description (part 2). Dialectologia et Geolinguistica, 31(1), 19-40. https://doi.org/10.1515/dialect-2023-0 [in English].

Del Gaudio, S. (2023b). Some morphosyntactic peculiarities of north-eastern Ukrainian dialects (Eastern Slavic context) [Alcune peculiarità morfosintattiche dei dialetti ucraini nord-orientali (contesto slavo-orientale)]. Europa Orientalis, 42, 425-439 [іn Italiano].

Del Gaudio, S. (2025a). Ukrainian border dialects in Belarusian Russian contact areas: characteristics and trends [Monograph]. Forthcoming [in English].

Del Gaudio, S. (2025b). Morphosyntactic and Typological tendencies in East Polissian border dialects. Livre des résumés. ILINGUISTIQUE. Paris. 34-37. URL: https://mks-paris.sciencesconf.org/data/pages/Linguistique_1.1_1.8.pdf (last access : 20.05.2025) [in English].

Decentralizacija [Decentralization]. 2025. URL: https://decentralization.gov.ua/news/12639 (last access : 20.05.2025) [in Ukrainian].

Mackevič, Ju F. (1959). Marfalohija dzejaslova ŭ belaruskaj move. Minsk: AN BSSR [in Belarusian].

Pugh, S., Press, I. (1999). Ukrainian: a comprehensive grammar. London: Routlege [in English].

Roncero, Toledo K. (2019). A typological approach to West Polesian Morphology and Syntax. [Doctoral thesis (PhD), The University of Surrey]. https://doi.org/10.15126/thesis.00851715 [in English].

Tyshchenko, K.M. (2009). Italy and Ukraine: millennia of ethnolinguistic contacts [Italija i Ukrajina: tysjačolitni etnomovni kontakty]. Kyiv: Akvilon–Pljus [in Ukrainian].

Vykhovanets, I., Horodentska, K. (2004). Theoretical morphology of the Ukrainian language [Teoretychna morfolohiia ukrainskoi movy]. Kyiv: Pul'sary [in Ukrainian].

Zhylko, F. T. (1966). Essays on the dialectology of the Ukrainian language [Narysy z dialektolohiji ukrajins'koji movy]. Kyiv: Radianska shkola [in Ukrainian].

Downloads

Published

2025-07-01

Issue

Section

CURRENT TRENDS OF SLAVIC STUDIES IN THE WORLD

How to Cite

Del Gaudio, S. (2025). Some morphosyntactic and typological tendencies in East Polissian border dialects. Current Issues of Ukrainian Linguistics: Theory and Practice, 50, 41-52. https://doi.org/10.17721/APULTP.2025.50.41-52