A SYMBOL-ORIENTED STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE SET OF PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS RELARING TO MOTHERHOOD (BASED ON WESTERN POLESIAN PHRASEOLOGICAL SOURCE MATERIAL)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/Keywords:
structural and semantic set, phraseological system, ethnic and cultural code, component, symbol, areal phraseology, western Polesian phraseological unitsAbstract
This investigation is dedicated to the important topical issue of formulating an all-embracing analysis of the complete stock of Ukrainian-language phraseological units. Impetus is given to the pursuit of new aspects of phraseology-related research as a result of the problems of conceptualizing the correlation between the following entities: language and spiritual culture; language and mentality, and the interdependence of these factors; culture- and ethnos-specific semantic units; and the attention to be devoted to the dynamic processes and the ethnolinguistic possibilities of phraseological units, which amasses and preserves knowledge relating to the world around us. In a more precisely focused sense, the phraseological/semantic group relating to the topic of pregnancy was analyzed in detail and an analysis of some specific western Polesian phraseological units based on their structural components was carried out. As the end product of this structural and semantic analysis of phraseologisms, it was ascertained that their signification is determined by the conditions of life and existence of a people in different historical periods, and within the entities of the designated level the perceptive capacity of the Polesian people was effectuated. The symbol-related conditionality of the semantics of phraseological units was also determined, as well as the interconnection between their connotations and the peculiarities of the national mentality of the Ukrainian people.
References
1.Baiburіn A.K. The ritual in the traditional culture: the structural and semantic analysis of the East Slavic rites [Ritual v tradytsyonnoi kulturіe : strukturno-sіemantycheskyi analіz vostochnoslavianskіkh obriadov] / Baiburyn A. K. – SPb. : Nauka, 1993. – 224 s.
2.Borysenko V. Traditions and vital activity of ethnos [Tradytsii i zhyttiediialnist etnosu] / V. Borysenko. – K., 2000. – S. 102–103.
3.Boriak O.O. Ukraine : ethno-cultural mosaic [Ukraina : etnokulturna mozaika] / O.O. Boriak. – K : Lybid, 2006. – 328 s.
4.Voitovych V.M. Ukrainian mythology [Ukrainska mifolohiia] / V.M. Voinovych. – [vyd. 2-e, stereotyp]. – K. : Lybid, 2005. – 662, [4] s.
5.Hryhorenko T.V. Ethnographic vocabulary and phraseology in the Ukrainian literary language [Etnohrafichna leksyka i frazeolohiia u skladi ukrainskoi literaturnoi movy] : Avtoref. dys. ... kand. filol. nauk: 10.02.01. – Kyivsk. nats. un-t im. T. Shevchenka. – K., 2005. – 19 s.
6.Hromyk Y.V. The praseology of Polissya patois of Lypno village of Kivetsivskyy district of Volyn region [Frazeolohizmy poliskoi hovirky sela Lypno Kivetsivskoho raionu Volynskoi oblasti] / Y.V. Hromyk // Volyn− Zhytomyrshchyna : ist.-filol. zb. z rehion. problem. − Zhytomyr : [b.v.], 2002. − № 8. − S. 152−170.
7.Eliade M. The sacred and the profane. Mephistopheles and androgynous [Sviashchenne i myrske. Mefistofel i androhin] / M. Eliade. – Kyiv, 2001. – S. 7‒116.
8.Yermolenko S.Y. The folklore and literary language [Folklor i literaturna mova] / S.Y. Yermolenko. – K. : Nauk. dumka, 1987. – 245 s.
9.Zhujkova M.V. The semantic evolution of predicative lexicon in the context of magical practice [Semantichna evolucija predikatnoji leksiki v konteksti magichnoji praktiki] / M. V. Zhujkova // Uch. zap. Tavrych. nats. un-ta ym. V.Y. Vernadskoho. – Ser. «Fylolohyia. Sotsyalnыe kommunykatsyy». – Symferopol: [b. y.], 2011. – T. 24 (63), № 1, chast. 1. – S. 343–350.
10.Koval V.Y. Slavic ethnic phraseology in a gender perspective [Slavianskaia еtnofrazeolohyia v hendernom aspekte] / V.Y. Koval // Hrany slova : sb. nauch. st. k 65-letyiu prof. V. M. Mokyenko. – M. : OOO «Izd-vo ELYPS», 2005. – S. 82–88.
11.Mahrytska I.V. The semantic structure and cultural motivation of wedding phraseology in dialects of East Slobozhanschyna [Semantychna struktura i kulturna motyvatsiia vesilnykh frazeolohizmiv u skhidnoslobozhanskykh hovirkakh] / I.V. Mahrytska // Dialektolohichni studii. 2. Mova i kultura / [vidp. red. P.Y. Hrytsenko, N. V. Khobzei]. – L. : In-t ukrainoznavstva im. I. Krypiakevycha NAN Ukrainy, 2003. – S. 182–193.
12.Matsyuk Z. Ethnosymbolic conditionality of semantics of frazem with a component «water» / Z.Matsyuk // Water in slavonik phraseology and paremiology : collective monograph. Budapest : Tinta Konyvkiado. 2013. 733 P. (396‒402).
13.Uzhchenko V.D. Phraseology of modern Ukrainian language [Frazeolohiia suchasnoi ukrainskoi movy] / V.D. Uzhchenko, D.V. Uzhchenko. – K. : Znannia, 2007. – 494, [2] s.
14.Ukrainian ethnology [Ukrainska etnolohiia] / [za red. V.K. Borysenko]. – K. : Lybid, 2007. – 400 s.
15.Fenko M.Y. Ethnocultural specificity of semantic of phrases with the component bee [Etnokulturna spetsyfika semantyky frazem iz komponentom bdzhola] / M.Y. Fenko // Visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho u-tu : Seriia Movoznavstvo. ‒ Dnipropetrovsk, 2013. ‒ Vyp. 19. ‒ T. 3.
