MEDIA LINGUISTIC ASPECTS OF THE PERIPHRASTIC UNITS' ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/Keywords:
periphrasis, secondary nomination, language of mass-media, medialinguisticsAbstract
The article defines the tradition of periphrastic studies in different scientific paradigms. The main aspects of linguistic analysis of periphrastic units are observed. We can emphasize on the main aspects of research: structural, functional, cognitive, semantic, in terms of the origin. The main researches’ attention is paid to metaphorical or metonymical conversion and expansion of the denotatum and source of periphrastic units’ formation, their evaluative degree.
There is little information available of specific function of periphrasis in communication. Specific periphrase functions as a special form of communication in the media are beyond linguistic analysis. In particular, the functions of periphrase in various media genres and the role of periphrase in structuring of media text are not studied. Also opportunities of periphrastic units as a means of linguistic influence on mass linguistic consciousness are not analyzed. There is a perspective of studies in interpretation of media paraphrase as a special communication unit.
References
1. Bazarskaya N.I. Secondary nomination in linguistic signs system [Vtorichnaya nominatsiya v sisteme yazyikovyih znakov : (Na materiale perifraz angliyskogo i russkogo yazyikov) : avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk.] – Saratov, 1988. – 16 s.
2. Byteva T.I. Notes of Russian periphrastics [Ocherki po russkoy perifrastike]. - Krasnoyarsk : Krasnoyar. gos. un-t, 2002. – 277 s.
3. Vateva V. Periphrasis in mediastyle [Km voprosa za perifrazata v tekstove ot publicistichnyja styl] Sp Sovremenna humanitaristika, br. 1, Burgas, – 2010. – S. 39-44.
4. Vovchok D.P. Types and functions of metaphorical phrase in modern newspaper [Tipy i funktsii slovosochetaniy metaforicheskogo haraktera v sovremennoy gazete] : Avtoref. dis. . kand. filol. nauk. – M., 1974. – 18 s.
5. Galperin I.R. Text as an object of linguistic research [Tekst kak objekt lingvisticheskogo issledovnija]. – M., – 1981. – 139 s.
6. Evseejeva G.P. Periphrases in modern newspapers language [Peryfrazy v movi suchasnykh gazet (na materiali ukrajinskykh gazet 80-90 rokiv XX stolittia)]. – D., 2002. – 20 s.
7. Evdokimova E.V. Pragmatical and linguocultural aspects of periphrasis [Pragmaticheskiy i lingvokulturologicheskiy aspekty perifraz i shodnyih stilisticheskih priemov v gazetno-zhurnalnom diskurse (na materiale pressy Velikobritanii i SShA)] : avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk : 10.02.04 / E.V. Evdokimova . – Irkutsk ; Novosibirsk, 2008. – 19 s.
8. Esmenskaya N.A. Textual periphrasis and its functioning in diskurse in modern French [Tekstovaya perifraza i ee funktsionirovanie v svyaznom diskurse v sovremennom frantsuzskom yazyike (na materiale tekstov massovoy kommunikatsii)] : avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk : 10.02.05 / N.A. Esmenskaya. – M., 2005. – 17 s.
9. Eskova E.G. Intellectualization of famous persons periphrasis in modern media texts [Intellektualizatsiya perifraz izvestnyih lits v sovremennyih mediynyih tekstah] / E.G. Eskova // Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Ser.: Filologiya. Zhurnalistika. – 2010. – Vyp. 4. – S. 37-40.
10. Kobyilyanskiy I.Yu. Periphrasis as functional and semantical language unit [Perifraz kak funktsionalnosemanticheskaya edinitsa rechi (na mater. sovrem. ukrain. sovetskoy prozyi, poezii i publitsistiki)] : avtoref. dis. ... kand. filolog. nauk : 10.02.02 / Kobyilyanskiy I.Yu. ; Uzhgorod. gos. un-tet. – Uzhgorod, 1986. – 18 s.
11. Kolomiyets' M.P. Brief periphrasis dictionary [Korotkyy slovnyk peryfraz] / M.P. Kolomiyets', Ye.S. Rehushevs'kyy. – K., 1985. – 150 s.
12. Kostomarov V.G. Russian language in newspapers [Russkij jazyk na gazetnoj polose. Nekototyje osobennosti jazyka sovremennoj gazetnoj publicystiki] / V.G. Kostomarov. – M., 1971. – 271 s.
13. Lienkova T.A. Text-forming. strategies for creating a written reportage in modern German press [Tekstoobrazujushchije strategii sozdanija pismennogo diskursa reportazha v sovremennoj nemeckoj presse]. M. – 2009.
14. Lyskova T.V. Substantive paraphrases in modern journalistic discourse [Substantivnyie perifrazyi v sovremennompublitsisticheskom diskurse : dissertatsiya ... kan didata filologicheskih nauk] : 10.02.01 / Lyiskova T.V. – Kirov, 2012. – 233 s.
15. Malazhay G.M. Belorussian periphrasis: brief dictionary [Belaruskaya peryifraza : karotki slownik]. – Mn. : Vyisheyshaya shkola, 1974. – 158 s.
16. Malazhay G.M. Modern Belorussian language: periphrasis [Suchasnaja belaruskaja mova: perifraza]. – Mn., 1980. – 93 p.
17. Makarec Yu.S. Periphrastic nomination in Ukrainian publics [Peryfrazovi nominaciji v ukrajinskij publicustuci pochatku XXI st. avtoref. dys. … kand. philolog. nauk] : 10.02.01 – 2011. – 24 s.
18. Novikov A.B. Russian periphrases dictionary [Slovar perifraz russkogo yazyika : (na materiale gazetnoy publitsistiki)] / A.B. Novikov. – Moskva : Russkiy yazyik Media, 2004. – 332 s.
19. Novikov A.B. Substantive periphrases in modern soviet newspapers [Substantivnyie perifrazyi v sovremennoj sovetskoj gazetnoj publitsistike: Avtoref. dis. …. kand. filol. nauk]. – L., 1988. – 18 s.
20. Onyshchenko I.V. The evaluation category and methods of its expression [Katehoriya otsinky ta zasoby yiyi vyrazhennya v publitsystychnykh ta informatsiynykh tekstakh : Avtoref. dys... kand. filol. Nauk] / I.V. Onyshchenko ; Dnipropetr. nats. un-t. – D., 2005. – 20 s.
21. Rozanova G.Z. Periphrasis in German press [Perifraz i ego funktsionirovanie v presse GDR i FRG : Avtoref. dis...kand. filol. Nauk]. – M., 1973. – 26 s.
22. Synyna A.Y. Functional and pragmatic types of paraphrase in English journalism [Funktsyonal'no-prahmatycheskye typy peryfraz v anhloyazychnoy publytsystyke] / A.Y. Synyna // Vestn. Volhohr. hos. un-ta. Ser. 2, Yazykozn. 2012. # 1 (15) - S. 211-214.
23. Sirivlya M.A. Methods of pragmatical expression in text of newspaper [Priemyi sozdaniya pragmaticheskoy ekspressivnosti gazetnogo teksta (na materiale perifrasticheskih oborotov)] / M.A. Sirivlya // Sovremennyie problemyi nauki i obrazovaniya. – 2007. – № 3. – S. 122–125.
24. Stanieva Chr. Stylistic method of text analysis [Stilistichen podchod kum dinamikata na teksta]. Sofija, izd. Ilinda – Jevtimov. – 1997. – S. 119.
25. Yurchenko O.S. Praseological periphrases of Ukrainian literary language [Frazeolohichni peryfrazy ukrayins'koyi literaturnoyi movy]. Ch.1 : Uchbov. posib. – Kh.: RVH KhDU, 1983. – 119 s.
26. Bańko M. Słownik peryfraz, czyli wyrażeń omownych. – Warszawa : Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 2002. – 230 p.
27. Dulian R. Peryfrastyczne konstrukcje czasownikowe w języku polskim, Prace Instytutu Języka Polskiego, Wydania 91-93. Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich. – Wrocław, 1994. – P. 119-123.
28. Fuchs C. Paraphrase et énonciation . – Paris, Ophrys (Coll. L’Homme dans la Langue), 1994. – 185 p.
29. Fuchs C. La Paraphrase. – Paris, Presses Universitaires de France (Coll. Linguistique Nouvelle), 1982. – 184 p.
30. Głowiński M. Peryfrazy współczesne, Teksty : teoria literatury, krytyka, interpretacja nr 3, 1972, – S. 48-58.
31. Krzyżanowski P., Nowak P., Manipulacja w języku / pod red. Piotra Krzyżanowskiego, Pawła Nowaka. Lublin : UMCS, 2004. – 282 s.
32. Markunas Antoni, Stasińska Polina Wybrane wyrażenia peryfrastyczne w języku polskim i rosyjskim. Studium konfrontatywne. – Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, 2009. – 108 p.
33. Midjana Tetjana: Die Periphrase. Stauffenburg-Verlag, Tübingen 2005. — 344 p.
